wp-pagenavi domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/angrysas/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131You are unique because you go after big peaks. Most skiers couldn’t care less if they make a summit or not just go after good lines (as you just said). Mountaineers are more driven to get to the summit – you seem to fall into that category as well. Climbers again just care about the difficulty or aesthetics of a nice line on a crag. This couloir is not interesting for an ice climber for sure. For a mountaineer it’s a bit more exciting route than the scree slog – hence the choice. But back to your trip, you had awesome conditions for climbing as well as for skiing, and I think I understand how steepness is not a big factor for good skiers.
]]>I don’t bother carrying one because conditions are such a huge part of how difficult a ski is. I’m chasing interesting lines, not steep lines, steepness is just one factor of many.
]]>I’ve stopped taking an inclinometer with me but sure felt more than 45* at the steepest. 50-55* is a fair guess from some respected mountaineers (whom I actually believe). But fair enough most of it is less than, or around 45*. If it’s all ice it must be quite exhilarating.
]]>Glad you liked it. Not sure it was the 55+* mountaineers hype it to be (as many north faces in the Rockies are rated), but it was a good ski.
]]>Yes, your ski down looked really enticing. Definitely a lot nicer than the slog out. Smart…..
]]>Saw your entry in the register, sounded like a fun day. Sluff potential seems a lot easier to bear than rockfall, plus then you get to ski down after!
]]>